Abstract

Goal. To establish the factors of negative influence of weeds on plants of culture in the process of their joint vegetation. Task: to determine volumes of absorption of compounds of mineral nutrition by weeds.
 Methods. Common and special methods: Field - study of the influence of conditions of cultivation and agro measures on productivity indicators of millet; laboratory - definition of quantitative and qualitative characteristics; statistical - the establishment of mathematical models and statistical dependencies between the investigated factors and processes.
 Results On average, over the years of research, weed plants yielded 95 kg / ha of nitrogen for the density of crops of millet, 50 pct/m2, and the increase in the density of cultivated plants to 100-150 pct/m2 contributed to reducing the removal to 45-32 kg/ha . At the same time, the minimum indices of nitrogen weeds planting on the wheat grassland crops were 200 pct/m2 - 24 kg/ha, respectively. The removal of phosphorus at the density of crops of millet crops of 50 pct/m2 was 57,7 kg/ha of phosphorus, and from an increase in the density of cultivated plants to 100-150 pct/m2, the reduction of the removal was reduced to 27.8-19.9 kg/ha. At the same time, the minimum indices of removal of phosphorous weeds by plants on the crops of millet were the density of 200 pct/m2 - 14.4 kg/ha, respectively.
 Conclusion. The conducted studies allowed to determine that, on average, over the years, weeds of plants per hundred cubic meters of poppy-stalks produced 109 kg/hectare of potassium, while increasing the density of crops to 100-150 pct/m2 contributed to a decrease in take-off to 51.8 -37.1 kg / ha. At the same time, the minimum parameters of the removal of potassium weeds by plants on millet crops were 200 pct/m2 - 27.2 kg/ha respectively

Highlights

  • Âèíîñ ïîæèâíèõ ðå÷îâèí ç óðîæàoì — âàæëèâèé ïîêàçíèê, Âñòàíîâëåíî, ùî âèíîñ ïîæèâíèõ ðå÷îâèí 3çðóíòó íàâ3òü ïðè â3äíîñíî ìàë3é ÷èñåëüíîñò3 áóð’ÿí3â çíà÷íèé

  •  ðåçóëüòàò3 íà çàñì3÷åíèõ ïîëÿõ âîëîã3ñòüðóíòó â êîðåíåâì3ñíîìó øàð3 çíèæóoòüñÿ íà 2—5%

  • Ðàçîì ç âîëîãîþ âîíè ïîãëèíàþòü çðóíòó 3 çíà÷íó ê3ëüê3ñòü ö3ííèõ ïîæèâíèõ ðå÷îâèí [1]

Read more

Summary

Íàóêîâi äîñëiäæåííÿ

 ñåðåäíüîìó çà ðîêè äîñë3äæåíü ðîñëèíè áóð’ÿí3â çà ãóñòîòè ïîñ3â3â ïðîñà ïðóòîïîä3áíîãî 50 øò./ì2 âèíîñèëè 95 êã/ãà àçîòó, à îò çá3ëüøåííÿ ãóñòîòè êóëüòóðíèõ ðîñëèí äî 100—150 øò./ì2 ñïðèÿëî çìåíøåííþ âèíîñó äî 45—32 êã/ãà. Çà ãóñòîòè ïîñ3â3â ïðîñà ïðóòîïîä3áíîãî 100 øò./ì2 ë3äåðàìè 3ç çàñâîoííÿ àçîòó çðóíòó áóëè âèäè: ëîáîäà á3ëà — 1,28 ã/ì2, ùèðèöÿ çâè÷àéíà — 1,18, ìèø3é ñèçèé — 0,55, ã3ð÷èöÿ ïîëüîâà — 0,38 òà ã3ð÷àê øîðñòêèé — 0,35 ã/ì2. Ïîäàëüøå çðîñòàííÿ ãóñòîòè ïîñ3â3â ïðîñà ïðóòîïîä3áíîãî çìåíøèëî êàðäèíàëüíî ê3ëüêîñò ñïîæèòîãî ðîñëèíàìè áóð’ÿí3â àçîòó çðóíòó, îäíàê áåççàïåðå÷í3 ë3äåðè 3ç çàñâîoííÿ öüîãî åëåìåíòà æèâëåííÿ çàëèøèëèñü òàêèìè æ ÿê 3 çà ìåíøèõ íîðì âèñ3âó: ëîáîäà á3ëà, ùèðèöÿ çâè÷àéíà, ìèø3é ñèçèé, ã3ð÷èöÿ ïîëüîâà òà ã3ð÷àê øîðñòêèé. Âñòàíîâëåíî, ùî â ñåðåäíüîìó çà ðîêè äîñë3äæåíü ðîñëèíè áóð’ÿí3â çà ãóñòîòè ïîñ3â3â ïðîñà ïðóòîïîä3áíîãî 50 øò./ì2 âèíîñèëè 57,7 êã/ãà ôîñôîðó, à îò çá3ëüøåííÿ ãóñòîòè êóëüòóðíèõ ðîñëèí äî 100—150 øò./ì2 ñïðèÿëî çìåíøåííþ âèíîñó äî 27,8—19,9 êã/ãà. Ïîãëèíàííÿ áóð’ÿíàìè ñïîëóê êàë3þ (Ê2Î) çà ð3çíî¿ ãóñòîòè ðîñëèí ïðîñà ïðóòîïîä3áíîãî, ñåðåäío

Інші види
Вынос сорняками элементов NPK при разной густоте растений проса прутовидного
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call