Abstract

This article discusses a direction of sociocultural studies – the cultural history of natural resources – and the possibilities of its application in examining the causes of inequality and social exclusion in post-Soviet Lithuania. This theoretical-methodological approach assumes a strong interdependence shared between the extraction of natural resources, a state’s political system and institutions as well as certain sociocultural provisions. In exploring the concept of “internal colonization,” developed by historian of culture Alexander Etkind and other authors, this article sets guidelines for a comparative analysis of the sociopolitical structure of post-Soviet countries (especially Russia and Lithuania). Some initial hypotheses regarding the trends, differences, and similarities of post-Soviet societies in the long historical perspective, from the 16th century up to our time, are presented for further analysis. This article concludes that this methodological approach could be sufficiently promising in explaining the specifics of the socioeconomic development of independent Lithuania, in particular by applying the hypothesis of a “secondary internal colonization,” which has been raised during the course of the investigation.

Highlights

  • This article discusses a direction of sociocultural studies – the cultural history of natural resources – and the possibilities of its application in examining the causes of inequality and social exclusion in post-Soviet Lithuania

  • Mintis ir veiksmas could be sufficiently promising in explaining the specifics of the socioeconomic development of independent Lithuania, in particular by applying the hypothesis of a “secondary internal colonization,” which has been raised during the course of the investigation

  • Tokiais aspektais ši tema Lietuvos istoriografijoje ir socialiniuose moksluose faktiškai netyrinėta

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Kad jam, kaip ir kitiems šios teorijos šalininkams, rūpi ne tik ekonominės, bet ir socialinės bei ypač kultūrinės vidinės kolonizacijos ypatybės (Эткинд, Уффельманн, Кукулин 2012; 6–50). Tačiau Rusijoje šie procesai nevyko sklandžiai ir atskirtis tarp valdžios ir pavaldinių ten yra matoma iki šiol, nepaisant bolševikų režimo pastangų, remiantis egalitaristinės komunizmo ideologijos reikalavimais, šią distanciją bent jau formaliai naikinti, nors, kita vertus, ji buvo dar labiau išryškinta dalį visuomenės pavertus „liaudies priešais“ ir išsiuntus į GULAG’ą bei tremtį.

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.