Abstract
It is much expected from the relatively novel, open, royalty-free AV1 (Alliance for Open Media (AOMedia) Video 1) standard. At this moment, there are many new variants of AV1 format. It is designed for efficient video internet delivery and high-quality video transmission. AV1 is recognized as Google?s VP9 format successor. One of the reference tools used so far for testing AV1 is libaom- AV1. Nevertheless, due to its time-consuming performance, there are now different available standalone solutions for experimental analysis. Here, one such solution AOMedia?s standalone aomenc (aomenc-AV1) is tested in order to analyze quality assessment based on constant quality constraint factor. Three different metrics are calculated for various 4k video content of the same frame rate. Moreover, rav1e implementation was tested for the same visual data, where rav1e-AV1 also represents an AV1 video encoder, which is considered reliable and suitable in most cases, where libaom is not applicable. In this paper, the comparison results between aomenc-AV1 and rav1e-AV1 are shown.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
