Abstract

Abstract Some countries that mainly follow the inquisitorial system, such as Russia, France, and Vietnam, tend to absorb some features of the adversarial system. Using the Russian Federation as an example, this article raises questions including: How will the acquisition of adversarial elements affect the position, role, rights and obligations of the victim? Is the victim an independent party to participate in the adversary procedure? Do the adversarial activities of the victim and the other subjects exist at the pre-trial stages? In Vietnam, with the limitation of the victim to participate actively in the adversary procedure, it will be difficult for the victim to protect his or her legitimate rights and interests in the criminal proceedings. He/ she participates in the proceedings passively with the same role as witnesses. This article explores the role and position of the victim in the adversary procedure of the Russian Federation. While analyzing the rights and obligations of the victim in the adversary procedure, we found that the victim in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation is eligible to participate in the adversary procedure as an independent party. The article discusses the significance of this study and proposes approaches to improve the victim’s participation in adversary procedure in Vietnam’s criminal justice system.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.