Abstract

Vibratory behaviours are widespread in social insects, but the produced vibrations remain poorly explored. Communication using vibrations is an efficient way to transmit information in subterranean environments where visual and odorant signals are less efficient. In termites, different vibratory behaviours are performed in different contexts like reproductive regulation and alarm signalling, but only few studies explored the structure of the produced vibrations (i.e., duration, number of pulses, amplitude). Here, we described several types of vibrations produced by a vibratory behaviour widespread in termites (body-shaking), which can be transmitted through the substrate and detected by other colony members. We analysed the structures of the emitted vibrations and the occurrence of the body-shaking events in presence/absence of reproductives and/or in presence/absence of a stress stimuli (flashlight) in the subterranean termite Reticulitermes flavipes. Interestingly, only the presence of the reproductives did influence the number of pulses and the duration of the emitted vibrations. Moreover, the first part of the emitted vibrations seems to be enough to encode reproductive information, but other parts might hold other type of information. Body-shaking occurrence did increase in presence of reproductives but only briefly under a flashlight. These results show that vibratory cues are complex in termites and their diversity might encode a plurality of social cues.

Highlights

  • Vibratory behaviours are widespread in social insects, but the produced vibrations remain poorly explored

  • Signals are diversified and fit to the plurality of the social interactions involved in the colony functioning, i.e. nestmates recognition, reproductive status signalling, nest defence, alarm behaviour, recruitment, foraging ­behaviour[4]

  • They both significantly increase in presence of reproductives independently from flashlight stimulation. These results permit to ensure that body-shaking events give the same results than laser recordings

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Vibratory behaviours are widespread in social insects, but the produced vibrations remain poorly explored. The number of example in chemical communication is v­ ast[11,12] but other communication canals are involved and modulated like visual ­cues[13] Another communication canal present in ants, bees, wasps and termites, is used to transfer vibratory-acoustic ­cues[14,15,16,17,18]. These cues are widespread in termites with several behaviours able to produce vibrations like head-butting19–22, ­chewing[17] and body-shaking[9,23]. Vibrational communication could be dependent of the presence/absence of reproductives or their proxy (eggs or royal pheromone)[34,35,36]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call