Abstract
This article examines how the referential dimension of travel literature embarrasses certain forms of theoretical thinking. It suggests that there are three possible ways of dealing with this dimension: a candid one that does not problematize it, but fully experiences its effects; a formalist perspective that analyzes the text only as a discursive construction, even if it means questioning or ignoring its relation to the real world; and finally an approach that would keep the best of the two previous ones, and reflect on what passes from the world to the reader through the forms. This approach should reintegrate the principle of reference and associate with it two principles freely inspired from the Geneva School of Criticism: vibration and encounter.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
