Abstract

Tympanometry provides an objective measurement of the status of the middle ear. During tympanometry, the ear-canal pressure is varied, while the response of the ear to sound pressure is measured. The effects of the pressure on the mechanics of the middle ear are not well understood. This study is a continuation of our previous work in which the vibration response of the gerbil eardrum was measured in vivo under quasi-static pressure steps. In this study, we delivered a continuous pressure sweep to the middle ear and measured the vibration response at four locations for six gerbils. Vibrations were recorded using a single-point laser Doppler vibrometer and glass-coated reflective beads (diameter ~ 40µm) at the umbo and on the mid-manubrium, posterior pars tensa and anterior pars tensa.The vibration magnitudes were similar to those in the previous step-wise pressurization experiments. Most gerbils showed repeatability within less than 10dB for consecutive cycles. As described in the previous study, as the frequency was increased at ambient pressure, the vibration magnitude on the manubrium increased slightly to a broad peak (referred to as R1) and then decreased until a small peak appeared (referred to as R2), followed by multiple peaks and troughs as the magnitude decreased further. The low-frequency vibration magnitude (at 1kHz) decreased monotonically as the pressure became more negative except for a dip (about 500Pa wide) that occurred between - 700 and - 1800Pa. The lowest overall magnitude was recorded in the dip at mid-manubrium. The vibration magnitudes also decreased as the middle-ear pressure was made more positive and were larger than those at negative pressures. R1 was only visible at negative and small positive middle-ear pressures, while R2 was visible for both positive and negative pressures. R2 split into multiple branches after the middle-ear pressure became slightly positive. No magnitude dip was visible for positive middle-ear pressures.The low-frequency vibration magnitudes at negative middle-ear pressures on the pars tensa were higher than those on the manubrium. R1 was not visible for large negative middle-ear pressures on the pars tensa. R2 appeared as a multi-peak feature on the pars tensa as well, and a higher-frequency branch on the posterior pars tensa appeared as a trough on the anterior pars tensa. The magnitude dip was not present on the pars tensa. The largest overall magnitude was recorded at the R2 peak on the posterior pars tensa.The results of this study expand on the findings of the step-wise pressurization experiments and provide further insight into the evolution of the vibration response of the eardrum under quasi-static pressures.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call