Vibration control of an eleven-story structure with MR and TMD dampers using MAC predictive control, considering nonlinear behavior and time delay in the control system

Abstract

In the last two decades, model predictive control has made significant progress in research and industrial process control. This achievement is through the high ability of model predictive control to solve industrial process control problems in the time domain. It is applicable in many control systems, such as delayed systems, univariate and multivariable systems, non-minimum phase systems, and unstable systems. This strategy is essentially for controlling delayed systems. It is possible to create a time delay in transmitting structure movement data in the systems that use sensors and receivers of sensor-recorded data, which is a factor to reduce the efficiency of the control system and even the instability of the structure. In this study, to investigate and compensate the effect of time delay in the hybrid vibration control system, an 11-story structure with a tuned mass damper and an MR damper was used by model algorithmic control (MAC) and nonlinear behavior of the structure in the control process. The linear and nonlinear structural models are created in OpenSEES, the control system in MATLAB; and the TCP/IP connection method was used to connect two programs. The fuzzy decision system is based on accelerating and decelerating movement. The structure has been subjected to seven earthquakes with maximum accelerations of 0.1 g to 1.0 g with an incremental step of 0.1 g. According to the results of incremental dynamic analysis, the average percentage of the fuzzy control system performance reduction, considering the time delay, is 15.28% and 38.57% for the maximum displacement and base shear in the linear structure, and 8.04% and 5.97% for the nonlinear structure, respectively. The assumed time delays have been effectively overcome using the model algorithmic control system (MAC), determining the prediction horizon of the structural behavior, and optimizing the control force in the control horizon. The performance of the MAC control system has been better than the fuzzy control system and the passive control with TMD. The average improvement percentage of the results of the maximum linear and nonlinear structural displacement response is respectively equal to 10.2 and 11.8 with the MAC control system, compared to the fuzzy control system without time delay. For the maximum base shear, it is equal to 8.32 and 2.49, respectively.