Vibration control and stroke evaluation of bi-directional bistable nonlinear energy sinks applied in monopile offshore wind turbines during emergency shutdown

Abstract

Monopile offshore wind turbines (OWTs) in complex wind and wave environments can generate more excessive vibrations in the fore-aft (FA) and side-to-side (SS) directions when emergency shutdowns occur, and therefore damping techniques to alleviate such vibrations are essential. Due to the potential frequency detuning (reduced damping effectiveness) of traditional tuned mass dampers (TMDs) and stroke issues (such as large strokes of TMDs and limited maximum strokes of unidirectional nonlinear energy sinks (NESs)) in existing absorbers, this paper proposes a bi-directional bistable nonlinear energy sink (BBNES) to mitigate the vibration of the OWT in the FA and SS directions during the emergency shutdown. First, the proposed device and its operation mechanism are elaborated, and an optimization method for the device is introduced. Then, the dynamic analysis model of the BBNES is developed for vibration control of the OWT and incorporated into a fully coupled numerical simulation tool with high fidelity, FAST v8. Subsequently, the responses of the OWT without and with the proposed BBNES and the bi-directional tuned mass damper (BTMD) are exhaustively investigated under diverse conditions (including mass ratios, wind-wave loadings, emergency shutdown times, wind-wave misalignments, and 1st mode natural frequencies of the OWT) to reveal their performances and compare them. The research results show that under most conditions, the BBNES and BTMD have a similar damping performance in the FA direction, whereas the BBNES has a slightly lower damping performance in the SS direction than the BTMD. In addition, except for the wind velocity of 8 m/s at the hub and the wind-wave misalignment of 90°, the FA stroke of the BBNES with a small mass ratio (i.e., 0.01∼0.035) is significantly smaller than that of the BTMD with the same mass ratio by more than 1.1 m, and even up to about 4 m. The SS stroke of the BBNES is slightly greater than that of the BTMD, and in most cases, the difference between both is less than 0.52 m. Therefore, the BBNES is superior to the BTMD in this regard. When the 1st mode natural frequency of the OWT decreases, the BTMD can lose its tuning efficacy and makes the tower more susceptible to resonance caused by 1p and wave loadings, while the BBNES is not affected by the 1st mode natural frequency variation of the OWT, demonstrating its stronger robustness.