Abstract

Every research study that includes volunteer participants requires safety assurances in proportion to the risks of the study. Investigator-initiated clinical research can present unique regulatory challenges particularly for studies with a risk profile that warrants more oversight than minimal risk but less than for large, commercial, or high-risk research. The use of an independent safety officer (ISO) offers a middle way of right-sizing oversight to match the risk. ISOs are clinicians or researchers with relevant expertise who are independent of the investigator and the research study. Their relationship to the study is defined by a formal charter which is aligned with the protocol and Data and Safety Monitoring Plan to address the oversight process, responsibilities of the ISO, and clearly describe the variables to be monitored. The ISO responsibilities include reviewing safety data, adverse events, recruitment, demographics, study progress, data quality, protocol changes, and any new scientific information that pertains to the trial. Finally, the ISO reports in their review on any significant findings may propose modifications to the study or a need to stop the trial.

Highlights

  • Academic health centers (AHCs) are frequently the site of investigator-initiated clinical research (IICR)

  • Large cooperative group trials, such as those assembled by National Institutes of Health (NIH) institutes, have multiple sites with safety monitoring built into their structure and usually include a dedicated safety committee

  • While adverse events (AEs) that do not meet the criteria for serious adverse event (SAE) or unanticipated problems (UPs) do not need to be reported, they should be reviewed by the independent safety officer (ISO)

Read more

Summary

Research Methods and Technology Special Communication

Cite this article: Holbein MEB, Hammack BN, Melvin AJ, and Knox TA (2019) Via media: Role and responsibilities of the independent safety officer. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 3: 147–151. Received: 1 April 2019 Accepted: 9 June 2019 First published online: 29 August 2019

Introduction
Design
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.