Abstract

Introduction: Cochlear implantation is a fully accepted method of treating individuals with profound hearing loss. Since the indications for cochlear implantation have broadened and include patients with low-frequency residual hearing, single-sided deafness, or an already implanted ear (meaning bilateral cochlear implantation), the emphasis now needs to be on vestibular protection.Materials and Methods: The research group was made up of 107 patients operated on in the otorhinolaryngosurgery department: 59 females and 48 males, aged 10.4–80.2 years (M = 44.4; SD = 18.4) with hearing loss lasting from 1.4 to 56 years (M = 22.7; SD = 13.5). The patients underwent cVEMP, oVEMP, a caloric test, and vHIT assessment preoperatively, and, postoperatively, cVEMP and oVEMP at 1–3 months and a caloric test and vHIT at 4–6 months.Results: After cochlear implantation, there was postoperative loss of cVEMP in 19.2% of the patients, oVEMP in 17.4%, reduction of caloric response in 11.6%, and postoperative destruction of the lateral, anterior, and posterior semicircular canal as measured with vHIT in 7.1, 3.9, and 4% respectively.Conclusions: Hearing preservation techniques in cochlear implantation are connected with vestibular protection, but the risk of vestibular damage in never totally eliminated. The vestibular preservation is associated with hearing preservation and the relation is statistically significant. Informed consent for cochlear implantation must include information about possible vestibular damage. Since the risk of vestibular damage is appreciable, preoperative otoneurological diagnostics need to be conducted in the following situations: qualification for a second implant, after otosurgery (especially if the opposite ear is to be implanted), having a history of vestibular complaints, and when there are no strict audiological or anatomical indications on which side to operate.

Highlights

  • Cochlear implantation is a fully accepted method of treating individuals with profound hearing loss

  • CVEMP and ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials (oVEMPs) were not performed if there were superior semicircular canal dehiscence syndrome (SSCD), inner ear malformation, retrocochlear pathology, central nervous system (CNS) pathology affecting the reflex arc, conductive hearing loss, or highly probable conductive hearing loss

  • Subjects were excluded after a non-standard course of the Cochlear implantation (CI) procedure: traumatic electrode insertion (n = 2), with the need to apply a trial electrode in one patient, and a narrow round window niche demanding an extended round window approach (n = 2)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Cochlear implantation is a fully accepted method of treating individuals with profound hearing loss. Cochlear implantation (CI) is a well-known method of treating individuals with profound hearing loss. Patients with bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss and those with unilateral deafness [5] or partial deafness [6] or the elderly [7] can profit from cochlear implantation. Bilateral implantation in order to achieve better speech discrimination and sound localization is becoming more common [8]. This brings new opportunities and new risks to cochlear implant surgery

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call