Abstract

BackgroundVessel-sparing anastomotic repair (vsAR) has been developed as a less traumatic alternative to transecting anastomotic repair (tAR) to treat isolated short bulbar urethral strictures. This vessel-sparing technique could result in improved functional outcomes without jeopardizing the excellent surgical outcome after (transecting) anastomotic repair. The purpose of this study is to directly compare vsAR and tAR for both surgical and functional outcomes.MethodsThis trial is a prospective, interventional, multi-center, single-blinded, 1:1 randomized, controlled, non-inferiority, phase II trial. Sample size calculation resulted in a required sample size of 100 patients (50 patients per arm). Trial participants will be randomized by an independent third party using a computer-based random sequence generator with permuted blocks of variable size. The primary objective of this trial is to show that vsAR is non-inferior to tAR in terms of failure-free survival after 24 months of follow-up, considering a non-inferiority limit of 10%. Failure is defined as the inability to pass a 16-Fr flexible cystoscope through the reconstructed area without damaging the urethral mucosa. Secondary end-points mainly include differences in postoperative complications and changes in functional outcome parameters, which will be assessed with validated questionnaires. All participants are scheduled for follow-up at 3, 12, and 24 months postoperatively.DiscussionThis trial will provide level Ib evidence about the differences in both surgical and functional outcome between vsAR and tAR, which may importantly scape the future of bulbar urethral reconstruction. Depending on the trial results, this phase II trial may generate a larger phase III trial with more statistical power and a lower alpha value.Trial registrationThis trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03572348) and in the Belgian Clinical Trial Registry (B670201837335). The trial was registered prospectively. Registered on 28 June 2018.

Highlights

  • Background and rationale {6a} Urethral stricture disease is a common urological condition in men

  • It is only required to excise the narrow segment of the urethra and the surrounding spongiofibrosis, and a full thickness transection of the corpus spongiosum is unnecessary

  • This study will provide evidence about whether Vessel-sparing anastomotic repair (vsAR) yields non-inferior surgical results compared to transecting anastomotic repair (tAR) or not

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background and rationale {6a} Urethral stricture disease is a common urological condition in men. The International Consultation on Urologic Diseases (ICUD) recommends anastomotic repair (AR) urethroplasty for isolated short bulbar urethral strictures [3]. It is only required to excise the narrow segment of the urethra and the surrounding spongiofibrosis, and a full thickness transection of the corpus spongiosum is unnecessary. Against this background, Jordan et al published an alternative, vessel-sparing technique in 2007 [4, 5], and since several urethroplasty centers have implemented this technique in their surgical repertoire [6,7,8,9,10]. The purpose of this study is to directly compare vsAR and tAR for both surgical and functional outcomes

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call