Abstract

A trait must genetically correlate with fitness in order to evolve in response to natural selection, but theory suggests that strong directional selection should erode additive genetic variance in fitness and limit future evolutionary potential. Balancing selection has been proposed as a mechanism that could maintain genetic variance if fitness components trade off with one another and has been invoked to account for empirical observations of higher levels of additive genetic variance in fitness components than would be expected from mutation–selection balance. Here, we used a long-term study of an individually marked population of North American red squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus) to look for evidence of (1) additive genetic variance in lifetime reproductive success and (2) fitness trade-offs between fitness components, such as male and female fitness or fitness in high- and low-resource environments. “Animal model” analyses of a multigenerational pedigree revealed modest maternal effects on fitness, but very low levels of additive genetic variance in lifetime reproductive success overall as well as fitness measures within each sex and environment. It therefore appears that there are very low levels of direct genetic variance in fitness and fitness components in red squirrels to facilitate contemporary adaptation in this population.

Highlights

  • The Robertson–Price identity states that a trait must be genetically correlated with fitness to evolve in response to natural selection (Robertson 1966; Price 1970, 1972)

  • Mean lifetime reproductive success (LRS) of individuals averaged 1.5 Æ 3.9 for individuals born in mast years and 1.0 Æ 3.3 for individuals born in nonmast years

  • A trait must be genetically correlated with fitness (Price 1970), which requires genetic variance in both the focal trait and fitness (Houle 1991)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Robertson–Price identity states that a trait must be genetically correlated with fitness to evolve in response to natural selection (Robertson 1966; Price 1970, 1972). Both fitness and the trait in question must have some level of additive genetic variance to be correlated (Houle 1991). Additive genetic variance in fitness is a prerequisite for evolution and provides an overall measure of the current adaptive capability of a population (Shaw and Shaw 2013), but it is rarely measured directly in studies of microevolution in the wild (Morrissey et al 2010).

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.