Abstract
Severe intracranial hypertension is strongly associated with mortality. Guidelines recommend medical management involving sedation, hyperosmotic agents, barbiturates, hypothermia, and surgical intervention. When these interventions are maximized or are contraindicated, refractory intracranial hypertension poses risk for herniation and death. We describe a novel intervention of verticalization for treating intracranial hypertension refractory to aggressive medical treatment. This study was a single-center retrospective review of six cases of refractory intracranial hypertension in a tertiary care center. All patients were treated with a standard-of-care algorithm for lowering intracranial pressure (ICP) yet maintained an ICP greater than 20mmHg. They were then treated with verticalization for at least 24h. We compared themedian ICP, the number of ICP spikes greater than 20mmHg, and the percentage of ICP values greater than 20mmHg in the 24h before verticalization vs. after verticalization. We assessed the use of hyperosmotic therapies and any changes in the mean arterial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure related with the intervention. Five patients were admitted with subarachnoid hemorrhage and one with intracerebral hemorrhage. All patients had ICP monitoring by external ventricular drain. The median opening pressure was 30mmHg (25th-75th interquartile range 22.5-30mmHg). All patients demonstrated a reduction in ICP after verticalization, with a significant decrease in the median ICP (12 vs. 8mmHg; p < 0.001), the number of ICP spikes (12 vs. 2; p < 0.01), and the percentage of ICP values greater than 20mmHg (50% vs. 8.3%; p < 0.01). There was a decrease in total medical interventions after verticalization (79 vs. 41; p = 0.05) and a lower total therapy intensity level score after verticalization. The most common adverse effects included asymptomatic bradycardia (n = 3) and pressure wounds (n = 4). Verticalization is an effective noninvasive intervention for lowering ICP in intracranial hypertension that is refractory to aggressive standard management and warrants further study.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.