Vertical profiles, aerosol microphysics, and optical closure during the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment: Measured and modeled column optical properties

Abstract

During the Atlantic Stratocumulus Transition Experiment (ASTEX) in June 1992, two descents in cloud‐free regions allowed comparison of the change in aerosol optical depth as determined by an onboard total‐direct‐diffuse radiometer (TDDR) to the change calculated from measured size‐resolved aerosol microphysics and chemistry. Both profiles included a pollution haze layer from Europe, but the second also included the effect of a Saharan dust layer above the haze. The separate contributions of supermicrometer (coarse) and submicrometer (fine) aerosol were determined, and thermal analysis of the pollution haze indicated that the fine aerosol was composed primarily of a sulfate/water mixture with a refractory sootlike core. The soot core increased the calculated extinction by about 10% in the most polluted drier layer relative to a pure sulfate aerosol but had significantly less effect at higher humidities. A 3‐km descent through a boundary layer air mass dominated by pollutant aerosol with relative humidities (RH) 10–77% yielded a close agreement between the measured and calculated aerosol optical depths (550 nm) of 0.160 (±0.07) and 0.157 (±0.034), respectively. During descent the aerosol mass scattering coefficient per unit sulfate mass (inferred) varied from about 5 to 16 m2 g−1 and was primarily dependent upon ambient RH. However, the total scattering coefficient per total fine mass was far less variable at about 4 ± 0.7 m2 g−1. A subsequent descent through a Saharan dust layer located above the pollution aerosol layer revealed that both layers contributed similarly to aerosol optical depth. The scattering per unit mass of the coarse aged dust was estimated at 1.1 ± 0.2 m2 g−1. The large difference (50%) in measured and calculated optical depth for the dust layer exceeded estimated measurement uncertainty (12%). This is attributed to inadequate data on the spatial variability of the aerosol field within the descent region, a critical factor in any validation of this type. Both cases demonstrate that surface measurements may be a poor indicator of the characteristics and concentration of the aerosol column.