Abstract

SummaryBackgroundThe main criteria for lameness assessment in horses are head movement for forelimb lameness and pelvic movement for hindlimb lameness. However, compensatory head nod in horses with primary hindlimb lameness is a well‐known phenomenon. This compensatory head nod movement can be easily misinterpreted as a sign of primary ipsilateral forelimb lameness. Therefore, discriminating compensatory asymmetries from primary directly pain‐related movement asymmetries is a prerequisite for successful lameness assessment.ObjectivesTo investigate the association between head, withers and pelvis movement asymmetry in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness.Study designExperimental study.MethodsIn 10 clinically sound Warmblood riding horses, forelimb and hindlimb lameness were induced using a sole pressure model. The horses were then trotted on a treadmill. Three‐dimensional optical motion capture was used to collect kinematic data from reflective markers attached to the poll, withers and tubera sacrale. The magnitude and side (left or right) of the following symmetry parameters, vertical difference in minimum position, maximum position and range‐up were calculated for head, withers, and pelvis. Mixed models were used to analyse data from induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness.ResultsFor each mm increase in pelvic asymmetry in response to hindlimb lameness induction, withers movement asymmetry increased by 0.35–0.55 mm, but towards the contralateral side. In induced forelimb lameness, for each mm increase in head movement asymmetry, withers movement asymmetry increased by 0.05–0.10 mm, in agreement with the head movement asymmetry direction, both indicating lameness in the induced forelimb.Main limitationsResults must be confirmed in clinically lame horses trotting overground.ConclusionsThe vertical asymmetry pattern of the withers discriminated a head nod associated with true forelimb lameness from the compensatory head movement asymmetry caused by primary hindlimb lameness. Measuring movement symmetry of the withers may, thus, aid in determining primary lameness location.

Highlights

  • Subjective visual evaluation and semi-quantitative assessment of lameness is standard practice and aims to identify the affected limb(s) and localise the cause of pain or dysfunction

  • The results indicated that the relationship between head and withers asymmetry predicts the relationship between head and pelvic asymmetry in 69–77% of horses

  • The current study aimed to investigate the association between head, withers and pelvis movement asymmetry in horses with induced forelimb and hindlimb lameness and to evaluate whether movement symmetry of the withers can be used to discriminate a compensatory head nod in horses with hindlimb lameness from a head movement asymmetry due to primary forelimb lameness

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Subjective visual evaluation and semi-quantitative assessment of lameness is standard practice and aims to identify the affected limb(s) and localise the cause of pain or dysfunction. The main criteria for both visual and objective lameness assessment are asymmetries in the head movement for forelimb lameness and asymmetries in the pelvic movement for hindlimb lameness [5,6,7]. Compensatory movement asymmetry of the head, caused by primary hindlimb lameness, and compensatory movement asymmetry of the pelvis, caused by primary forelimb lameness, can be present during straight line trot [5,6,8,9,10] and lungeing [11]. Compensatory head nod in horses with primary hindlimb lameness is the most prominent. This compensatory head movement asymmetry can be misinterpreted as a primary lameness of the ipsilateral forelimb.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call