Abstract

A robust method to estimate vertical crustal motions by combining geocentric sea level measurements from decadal (1992-2003) TOPEX/POSEIDON satellite altimetry and long-term (>40 years) relative sea level records from tide gauges using a novel Gauss-Markov stochastic adjustment model is presented. These results represent an improvement over a prior study (Kuo et al. 2004) in Fennoscandia, where the observed vertical motions are primarily attributed to the incomplete Glacial Isostatic Adjustment (GIA) in the region since the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The stochastic adjustment algorithm and results include a fully-populated a priori covariance matrix. The algorithm was extended to estimate vertical motion at tide gauge locations near open seas and around semi-enclosed seas and lakes. Estimation of nonlinear vertical motions, which could result from co- and postseismic deformations, has also been incorporated. The estimated uncertainties for the vertical motion solutions in coastal regions of the Baltic Sea and around the Great Lakes are in general <0.5 mm yr^(-1), which is a significant improvement over existing studies. In the Baltic Sea, the comparisons of the vertical motion solution with 10 collocated GPS radial rates and with the BIFROST GIA model show differences of 0.2±0.9 and 1.6±1.8 mm yr^(-1), respectively. For the Great Lakes region, the comparisons with the ICE-3G model and with the relative vertical motion estimated using tide gauges only (Mainville and Craymer 2005) show differences of -0.2±0.6 and -0.1±0.5 mm yr^(-1), respectively. The Alaskan vertical motion solutions (linear and nonlinear models) have an estimated uncertainty of -0.2±1.6 mm yr^(-1), which agree qualitatively with GPS velocity and tide gauge-only solutions (Larsen et al. 2003). This innovative technique could potentially provide improved estimates of the vertical motion globally where long-term tide gauge records exist.

Highlights

  • Relative sea level change is the variation in the position of the mean sea surface relative to the solid Earth, or a benchmark on the crust of the solid Earth referenced to the tide gauge instrument

  • The method demonstrated significantly reduced solution uncertainties compared with other studies, such as by Nerem and Mitchum (2002), where estimated vertical crustal motions are provided with accuracies of 1 - 2 mm yr-1 or larger

  • It is assumed that the drift errors associated with both instruments, which are inseparable from the signals of absolute sea level and vertical motion, Fig. 2

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Relative sea level change is the variation in the position of the mean sea surface relative to the solid Earth, or a benchmark on the crust of the solid Earth referenced to the tide gauge instrument. The method demonstrated significantly reduced solution uncertainties compared with other studies, such as by Nerem and Mitchum (2002), where estimated vertical crustal motions are provided with accuracies of 1 - 2 mm yr-1 or larger. This latter approach involved computing the sea level differences between 114 tide gauges and T/P altimetry over one decade. Results of the estimated vertical motion solutions are provided for three regions, namely the Baltic Sea, the Great Lakes, and Alaskan coastal region These estimates are compared to independent observations and geophysical models. The ability to improve vertical motion solutions near the vicinity of long term tide gauges should eventually enhance the accuracy of sea level change estimates

Data Analysis
Algorithm for Semi-Enclosed Basins
Estimation procedure has the following form:
Vertical Motion in Fennoscandia
Vertical Motions in the Great Lakes
Vertical Motion in Alaska
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call