Abstract

In an analysis of the reconstruction measures in the old city or Lalitpur (Patan) after the 2015 earthquakes in Nepal, it is shown that, contrary to usual assumptions, the reconstruction was not only concentrated on the prominent, strongly internationally promoted and financed world cultural heritage sites, but took also place at smaller sites—especially at arcaded platform (phalcā), small monasteries and shrines throughout the city. While the larger royal squares, often at the heart of tourism and heritage policies, are important for the status and hierarchy of kings, queens and associated castes, the smaller and possibly less visually spectacular buildings and rituals ‘off the 5-Star map’ (the intangible heritage) are not less and are possibly even more relevant to inhabitants. Understanding this intangible heritage requires a different approach to what heritage means and how it is experienced from a more vernacular perspective. Rather than being firmly defined, heritage, and the reconstruction thereof, dynamically and controversially shapes how the disaster of the earthquake has been experienced, and is also connected to larger discourses on urban and social transformation and to concepts of ethnicity, nation and citizenship as well as social, symbolic prestige and economic status and distinction. The Gorkha Earthquakes have also produced a rich field of vernacular heritage formations and processes that enable us to consider heritage as placemaking. In this context, controversial concepts like ‘authenticity’ as well as various qualities and temporalities of ‘community’ participation and formation should be considered.

Highlights

  • The Gorkha Earthquakes and Their ConsequencesOn 15 January 1934, Nepal was hit by a strong earthquake—as often happened in the centuries before

  • The Gorkha Earthquakes have produced a rich field of vernacular heritage formations and processes that enable us to consider heritage as placemaking

  • We look at quantifiable data related to reconstruction initiatives in the old city of Patan (Lalitpur) and contextualize this with respect to the particular habitat of the city in which cultural heritage comes to play a vital role for thinking about recovery and attachment to place and practices, both of which can be understood as contributing to notions of sustainability

Read more

Summary

Introduction—The Gorkha Earthquakes and Their Consequences

On 15 January 1934, Nepal was hit by a strong earthquake—as often happened in the centuries before. In Nepal, one sometimes hears that the country is shaken every hundred years This view is not entirely unjustified if one considers the dates: 25 April and 12 May 2015, 15 January 1934, 28 August 1917, 26 August 1833, July 1767, January 1681, June 1505, August 1408. The causes of these earthquakes are gigantic tectonic shifts. The Indo-Australian Plate has been moving slowly northwards at a speed of about 4.5 cm per year towards the much larger Eurasian Plate, shifting towards the Himalayan fold mountains This plate movement takes place under such high pressure that the tension built up is discharged erratically. 1767 26 August 1833 28 August 1916 15 January 1934 20 August 1988 25 April 2015

12 May 2015
The Heritage Situation in the Kathmandu Valley
The Reconstruction Work and Its Stakeholders
Debates and Strategies
The Authenticity Approach
The Community Participation Approach
Pimbahal—Selfbranding as Reinvention of Community Heritage
Cyasal—Heritage as a Resource for Community Regeneration
Findings
Open Spaces
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call