Verification Results from the 2017 HMT–WPC Flash Flood and Intense Rainfall Experiment

Abstract

AbstractThe Flash Flood and Intense Rainfall (FFaIR) Experiment developed within the Hydrometeorology Testbed (HMT) of the Weather Prediction Center (WPC) is a pseudo-operational platform for participants from across the weather enterprise to test emerging flash flood forecasting tools and issue experimental forecast products. This study presents the objective verification portion of the 2017 edition of the experiment, which examines the performance from a variety of guidance tools (deterministic models, ensembles, and machine-learning techniques) and the participants’ forecasts, with occasional reference to the participants’ subjective ratings. The skill of the model guidance used in the FFaIR Experiment is evaluated using performance diagrams verified against the Stage IV analysis. The operational and FFaIR Experiment versions of the excessive rainfall outlook (ERO) are evaluated by assessing the frequency of issuances, probabilistic calibration, Brier skill score (BSS), and area under relative operating characteristic (AuROC). An ERO first-guess field called the Colorado State University Machine-Learning Probabilities method (CSU-MLP) is also evaluated in the FFaIR Experiment. Among convection-allowing models, the Met Office Unified Model generally performed optimally throughout the FFaIR Experiment when using performance diagrams (at the 0.5- and 1-in. thresholds; 1 in. = 25.4 mm), whereas the High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR), version 3, performed best subjectively. In terms of subjective and objective ensemble scores, the HRRR ensemble scored optimally. The CSU-MLP overpredicted lower risk categories and underpredicted higher risk categories, but it shows future promise as an ERO first-guess field. The EROs issued by the FFaIR Experiment forecasters had improved BSS and AuROC relative to the operational ERO, suggesting that the experimental guidance may have aided forecasters.