Abstract
Abstract An approach is presented for calculation verification of geometry-based and voxel-based finite element modelling techniques used for biological hard tissue. The purpose of this study is to offer a controlled comparison of geometry- and voxel-based finite element modelling in terms of the convergence (i.e., discretization based on mesh size and/or element order), accuracy, and computational speed in modelling biological hard tissues. All of the geometry-based numerical test models have hp-converged at an acceptable mesh seed length of 0.6mm, while not all voxel-based models exhibited convergence and no voxel models p-converged. Converged geometry-based meshes were found to offer accurate solutions of the deformed model shape and equivalent vertebral stiffness, while voxel-based models were 6.35%±0.84% less stiff (p < 0.0001) and deformed 6.79%±0.96% more (p < 0.0001). Based on the controlled verification study results, the voxel-based models must be confirmed with local values and validation of quantities of interest to ensure accurate finite element model predictions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
