Abstract

Three different approaches were investigated for the use of CAD models with Monte Carlo transport simulations of a simplified stellarator type verification geometry. These include the traditional Constructive Solid Geometry (CSG) approach with the geometry translated into Monte Carlo representation, the use of Unstructured Mesh (UM) geometry as available with MCNP6, and the direct particle tracking technique of DAGMC. The three methods were shown to be both applicable and suitable to represent the verification geometry and provide comparable results. With regards to the later application to a real stellarator geometry, the DAGMC and the UM approaches are preferred over the CSG approach due to the inherent limitations of the latter.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.