Abstract
Incomplete knowledge in argumentation frameworks may occur during the single steps of an elicitation process, when merging different beliefs about the current state of an argumentation framework, or when it is simply not possible to obtain complete information. The semantics of argumentation frameworks with such incomplete knowledge have previously been modeled in terms of an inco mplete attack relation among the given arguments by Cayrol et al.i¾?[12] or when adding an argument that interacts with already present argumentsi¾?[14]. We propose a more general model of argument-incomplete argumentation frameworks with a variable set of arguments, and we study the related verification problems for various semantics in terms of their computational complexity.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
