Abstract

While research tends to explore questions of power and leadership at the national level, populism in Europe has moved beyond national borders, with an increasing number of transnational movements and organizations. This article investigates the Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25) and its leadership’s main speeches. Informed by both discourse theory and Michel Foucault’s work on parrhesia (veridiction), the analysis draws on readings of transnational Euroalternativism and populism, pointing out the conflicting logic of bringing them together at the transnational level. Our findings thus stress the increasing politicization of European integration as an opportunity to mobilize transnational activities, which are based on the populist ‘people vs. the elites’ dichotomy and against Brussels’ unaccountable elites (see FitzGibbon & Guerra, 2019), while indicating the limits of leadership in a populist transnational movement (de Cleen, Moffitt, Panayotu, & Stavrakakis, 2019; Marzolini & Souvlis, 2016).

Highlights

  • The Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25) officially took off at the Volksbühne in Rosa Luxembourg Platz, in Berlin, on Tuesday 9th February 2016

  • Having elaborated on how the question of leadership affects the transnational expansion of DiEM25, the conclusion of this study addresses the weakness of shifting to a homogeneous people for a transnational populist movement and we underline the political potential of a progressive Euroalternativist movement speaking truth to power via its leader(ship)

  • “We are inspired by a Europe of Reason, Liberty, Tolerance and Imagination made possible by comprehensive Transparency, real Solidarity and authentic Democracy” (DiEM25, n.d.-f)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Democracy in Europe Movement 2025 (DiEM25) officially took off at the Volksbühne (the ‘People’s Theatre’) in Rosa Luxembourg Platz, in Berlin, on Tuesday 9th February 2016. In order to fill this gap, our analysis examines the use of Euroalternativist discourses by the political leadership in transnational populism, using DiEM25 as its case study. In terms of discourse theory, signifiers such as ‘change the EU’ or ‘for a more democratic Europe’ are used tendentially in Varoufakis’ Euroalternativist discourse as unspoken truths They can bring together the notion of the people, and establish an internal frontier in Europe’s social space between an ‘us, the pan-European people’ versus ‘them, the Brussels’ elites.’. Having elaborated on how the question of leadership affects the transnational expansion of DiEM25, the conclusion of this study addresses the weakness of shifting to a homogeneous people for a transnational populist movement and we underline the political potential of a progressive Euroalternativist movement speaking truth to power via its leader(ship)

Laclau’s Populism and Foucault’s Parrhesia
DiEM25 as a Euroalternative Transnational Movement
A Note on Methodology
Rereading the Discourse of DiEM25’s Political Leadership
Euroalternativism and Populism in the Context of True Discourse
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.