Abstract

The aim of this retrospective study was to compare patient characteristics, treatment patterns and treatment results in two groups of patients with limited disease (LD) and extensive disease (ED) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) in 2004 - 2005 vs. 2007 - 2008. We included all patients with LD or ED SCLC in this retrospective analysis who were diagnosed in our department in the periods 2004 - 2005 and 2007 - 2008. We collected data on patient characteristics, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, treatment response and median survival. Statistical analyses were separately performed for patients in LD and ED SCLC. 109 patients had LD SCLC. The response rate on first-line therapy was 74 %. More than half of the cases had recurrent disease. Second-line treatment was given to about two thirds of these patients. Third-line therapy was administered in around 15 % of all cases. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was performed more frequently from 2007 - 2008. The median survival was 17 months. There were no statistically significant differences regarding patient characteristics and treatment results. ED SCLC was present in 188 patients. The response rate was around 68 %. All patients relapsed, second-line therapy was administered in half of these cases; third-line therapy in 10 % of all cases. No statistically significant differences were detected between the two time frames. Median survival was 10 months. Overall, no statistically significant differences were present for patients with LD and ED SCLC in 2004 - 2005 vs. 2007 - 2008. Prophylactic cranial irradiation was employed more frequently in LD SCLC from 2007.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.