Abstract

The primary goal of this study was to investigate the association between verbal working memory and speech production and to address a number of ongoing questions about the nature of the relationship between these two phonological processes and reading ability. In an effort to clarify these relationships, the following areas were explored. First, previous research has suggested that poor readers generally do not perform as well as their normal-reading peers on phonological processing tasks, but their performance is not consistently worse than younger children reading at the same level. In order to examine this issue, this study compared the performance of less-skilled readers with that of skilled readers of the same age, as well as with the performance of younger children who were reading at the same level. Second, verbal working memory deficits have been found to account for about 10% of the variance in reading ability; however, the relationship between phonological processing skill and the various components of reading has not been clearly delineated. To clarify this relationship, three aspects of reading (i.e., non-word reading, real word reading, comprehension) were assessed in this study. Third, although evidence supports an association between verbal working memory and speech production, the exact nature of this relationship is not clear. This study used a variety of memory and speech production measures to further examine the association between these two phonological processes. And finally, although there is evidence supporting a relationship between accuracy of speech production and reading ability, the link between speed of speech production and reading ability is not as strong. In fact, there are indications that speech rate may be related to chronological age but not to reading. In order to explore this issue, speech production accuracy and speech production speed tasks were administered to skilled and less-skilled readers of the same age, as well as to a group of younger readers. Ninety second- and third-grade children served as subjects for this study. These children were divided equally among three groups who did not differ significantly in cognitive ability: (1) less-skilled third-grade readers; (2) skilled third-grade readers who were the same age as the less-skilled readers; and (3) second-graders who were reading at the same level as the less-skilled readers. In addition to reading and cognitive ability measures, three verbal working memory tasks, two speech production accuracy tasks, and three speech production speed tasks were individually administered to each of the

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call