Abstract

This article examines the notion of diplomatic courtesy and analyzes the ways of its language expression in Russian diplomatic discourse on the example of the speeches delivered by the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation Sergey Lavrov.
 
 Diplomatic courtesy is considered by the authors as an integral part of the diplomatic language, which, being a component of the official business style, is characterized by standardization, normalization, lack of emotionality and neutrality. At the same time, the diplomatic language allows the use of language means that are not regulated by the diplomatic protocol, which act as euphemisms and allow expressing opinions on acute political problems without violating the existing rules of diplomatic communication.
 
 The success of diplomatic communication is achieved with the help of universal speech formulas that serve as a means of manifesting courtesy and correspond to the standards of diplomatic communication. Such speech formulas themselves do not have legal force, but they have great moral and political power, since they contribute to the regulation of the nature of relations between countries.
 
 The article shows that diplomatic courtesy can be both positive and negative. The degree of courtesy in a diplomat's speech may depend on a wide range of various factors conditioned by the dependence of diplomatic etiquette on the specifics of interaction between communicants.
 
 Based on the results of the conducted research, the authors came to the conclusion that during various meetings the Minister of Foreign Affairs uses the following verbal means - speech formulas of greeting, address, compliment, invitation, gratitude, condolence, farewell. The frequency of such speech formulas is explained by the need of abidance of an international protocol that prescribes to diplomatic staff a certain sequence of verbal and non-verbal actions.

Highlights

  • The most important instrument of diplomacy is language, which serves as a means of fulfilment of the state foreign policy, and as an instrument for maintaining world order and prosperity.The importance of the diplomatic language is recognized by scientists from different fields of science who are engaged in researching various aspects of international communication, from ancient times to our days.Diplomatic language, being a kind of official-business style of speech, has all the characteristics inherent in this style: neutrality, terminology, accuracy, standardization, and lack of emotion.In diplomacy there are strict language frames that prescribe the choice of a certain type of lexical units and determine the style of communication

  • The analysis of the typewritten speeches made it possible to identify the most typical speech formulas used during the meetings and various statements of the minister, as well as to identify those evaluative tools that act as euphemisms and allow communicants to express their opinion on topical political issues without violating the diplomatic protocol and observing the norms diplomatic courtesy

  • One of the necessary components of international communication is speech etiquette, its knowledge and observance is a necessary condition for business and personal communication of diplomats

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most important instrument of diplomacy is language, which serves as a means of fulfilment of the state foreign policy, and as an instrument for maintaining world order and prosperity. In diplomacy there are strict language frames that prescribe the choice of a certain type of lexical units and determine the style of communication. Despite the fixed and universal diplomatic discourse at the present stage of the development of diplomatic activity, the language used by diplomats is not strictly limited in terms of choice of verbal means. This is explained by the fact that every state is particular in its historical development, socio-economic structure, national and cultural traditions, which cannot help reflecting in the language. Vol 12, No 5; 2019 there are specific national elements that must be taken into account in the process of international diplomatic communication

Methods
Results and Discussion
Summary
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call