Abstract

Perhaps the most surprising result of the NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) Magellan mission to Venus was the preservation of ~970 essentially pristine impact craters distributed in near-random fashion across the planet surface. The craters have been widely interpreted as evidence of near-global catastrophic volcanic resurfacing over 10–100 million years, ~500 million years ago. This view of Venus permeates textbooks and popular science, and is rarely questioned. The view of a catastrophically resurfaced Venus emerged relatively early in Magellan mission data analysis. We revisit the question of impact crater distribution and implications for Venus’s resurfacing and evolutionary processes using the wealth of observations that have emerged from ~15 years of Magellan data analysis. The widely cited nearglobal catastrophic volcanic resurfacing hypothesis, although initially compelling, does not stand up to the rigors of detailed geologic mapping and analysis. A separate but related hypothesis, the global stratigraphy hypothesis, deems that catastrophic resurfacing involved the emplacement of 1–3 km thick stacks of lava fl ows, which buried prefl ood craters across ~80% of Venus’s surface. However, geologic mapping indicates that thin, rather than thick, fl ows cover hypothesized prefl ood surfaces. In addition, the ~8% of the surface hypothesized as ancient prefl ood remnants in the global stratigraphy hypothesis, preserved in elevated plateaus, does not correlate spatially with Venus’s oldest surfaces as indicated by impact crater density and crater morphology. Finally, extensive lowland regions, representative of the hypothesized fl ooded surface, correlate with some of the oldest surfaces on the planet, contrary to hypothesis predictions. An alternative resurfacing hypothesis (the SPITTER hypothesis: Spatially Isolated Time-Transgressive Equilibrium Resurfacing), which combines aspects of previous hypotheses, calls for near-steady-state impact crater formation and destruction during a time of a globally thin lithosphere. Crater destruction occurred through time-integrated formation of numerous crustal plateaus, occurring in large local regions but punctuated in time and space. The SPITTER hypothesis does not depend on a particular mechanism of crustal plateau formation (whether by downwelling, E-mail: vhansen@d.umn.edu E-mail: duncan@ig.utexas.edu 256 Hansen and Young

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.