Abstract

Abstract The financing of young start-up companies is hindered by market failures that prompt governments around the world to intervene at the venture capital market. The aim of this paper is to give a comprehensive overview on this research field based on sound systematic literature review methodology, which was never done before. We found three major themes: pure governmental venture capital involvement, governmental-private venture capital cooperation, and governmental involvement in the financing of pre-seed startups. The evaluation of the governmental efforts varies according to these themes and also the investigated geographic location. Generally, pure governmental venture capital is the most controversial theme, the government-private cooperation is mostly viewed in a positive light, while the authors almost unanimously praise the government’s efforts when financing pre-seed startups. We found that the success of governmental venture capital should not be judged based on the realized return of its investments, since profit maximalization is not its goal. The governments try to alleviate market failures at the venture capital market and transition financed startup companies to private financing. Thus, we advise researchers to use the number of this type of successful transitions as the success criteria of governmental investments.

Highlights

  • The aim of the article is to give an overview on the governmental venture capital (GVC) research field from 2000 to 2018 by looking at the papers from the Scimago ranked journals

  • The financing of young start-up companies is hindered by market failures that prompt governments around the world to intervene at the venture capital market

  • One of the most direct ways of intervening at the venture capital market by the government is to set up its own fund manager that manages the state provided funds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The aim of the article is to give an overview on the governmental venture capital (GVC) research field from 2000 to 2018 by looking at the papers from the Scimago ranked journals. Numerous GVC programmes were announced to support young companies and academic researchers were keen on investigating the reason and the efficiency of the governmental intervention. A qualitative systematic literature review presents the main findings of a group of articles that are relevant to the subject investigating the articles from different dimensions (Pare et al 2015). Governmental involvement at the venture capital market has been the subject of two literature reviews so far (Callagher et al 2015; Colombo et al 2016) covering the period of 1988–2014. These literature reviews fall under the category of narrative reviews since they do not document the data collection and data analysis process and don’t employ frequency counts

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call