Abstract

Hydrocephalus is a complex pathology that can have a significant impact on the quality of life in all age groups. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) diversions from the lateral ventricle to the peritoneal cavity are regarded as the treatment of first intent, but they have a high revision rate, and there are multiple factors which can impair their proper insertion and function. One of the many alternatives to peritoneal shunting is redirecting the CSF towards the renal system. A literature search was conducted to identify the particularities of these types of shunts and what clinical context rendered themfeasible in pediatric and adult patient populations. Twenty-eight studies were found to meet the selection criteria. The shunts were classified into ventriculopyeloureteral, ventriculoureteral, and ventriculovesical. Their main advantage was that they did not depend on absorptionproperties of the tissues, like in the case of the peritoneum. However, several issues with ascending infections, bladder pressure imbalance, distal shunt migration, and calculus formation were noted. Literature suggests that the urinary tract can have the potential of diverting CSF when the peritoneum or atrium is not available, but further research is required to establish their proper role in current practice.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.