Ventricular tachycardia mapping and ablation using MIXture of well-established approaches. The MIX-VT study

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT) is still challenging despite impressive technology development, especially in mid- or low-volume centers. The most frequently used approach is homogenization of scar area responsible for VT, combined with standard electrophysiological (EP) approaches such as VT inducibility and mapping. However, in real life long-term efficacy of VT ablation in such centers does not exceed 50%. We hypothesized that an approach consisting of the mixture of various well-established parameters would be more effective than scar homogenization and VT non-inducibility as the endpoints. Purpose To compare the outcome of VT ablation using the standard approach (scar homogenization) and a more complex approach, called the MIX-VT protocol, using late potential mapping + pace mapping with rapid change of VT morphology to localize the critical isthmus + core isolation. All procedures were performed using the 3D mapping system, Pentaray mapping catheter, Smart-Touch ablation catheter and intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). Methods 48 consecutive patients (41 male, mean age 71.5 years) with ischemic cardiopathy referred for urgent VT ablation were included: 23 patients underwent "standard" VT ablation between December 2018 and December 2019, whereas the next 25 patients underwent ablation using the MIX-VT protocol between January 2020 and December 2020. First step in the MIX-VT group was to perform ICE imaging of the scar area from the right ventricle. Next, left ventricular maps were created during rhythm at which spontaneous VT occurred (sinus or paced). Areas of late potentials were identified to localize the critical isthmus where the abrupt change in the paced-QRS axis was seen. Finally, areas delineated by these two above-mentioned maneuvers where ablated in order to achieve core isolation (Figure 1). The patients were followed for 12 months in the outpatient clinic during ICD examination. The composite end-point for follow-up was VT recurrences terminated by anty-tachycardia pacing (ATP) or shock, or death. Results Clinical and demographic variables were similar between the two groups (Figure 2), except for a higher prevalence of diabetes mellites and number of previous ablations in the standard group (4/25 [16%] vs 10/23 [43%], p=0.03 and 2/24 vs 8/23 [34.8], p=0.03, respectively). Three patients from the MixVT group and one patient from the standard group were lost to follow-up. During follow-up, VT recurrences were significantly less frequent in the MIX-VT group (3/22 [13.6] vs 10/22 [45.4]. p=0.02. It was mostly driven by less ATP therapy. (Figure 2). One patient from the standard approach groups died. Conclusion Ablation for VT in low- or medium volume centers using the combination of well-established various EP approaches resulted in the improvement in overall survival and arrythmia-free survival. The presented approach does not involve additional resource utilization.