Abstract
Experiments were conducted in ten adult men to determine if rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMS) reduced the ventilatory response to two ‘steady-state’ respiratory loads compared to slow wave sleep (SWS). A constant addition of 150 (or 200) ml/min pure CO 2 to the inspirate (7 subjects) and 230 ml of added dead space (5 subjects) were the two respiratory loads. Inspiratory ventilation was measured by pneumotachygraph for at least five continuous minutes in wakefulness, SWS and REMS. The increase in ventilation to both stimuli was equal in SWS and REMS with no suggestion of an impaired response during the latter: increases in ventilation during CO 2 loading being 49 and 51%, SWS and REMS, respectively, and during additional dead space they were 53 and 59%, SWS and REMS, respectively. Following the addition of extra dead space, end tidal P CO 2 levels did not rise significantly more during REMS compared to SWS ( P > 0.5). These findings show that when ventilatory responses to CO 2 are considered across the whole of REMS (including periods with and without actual eye-movements) then they do not appear to be blunted compared to SWS.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.