Abstract
The difference between total lung capacity (TLC) by body plethysmography and alveolar volume (VA) from the single-breath lung diffusing capacity measurement provides an index of ventilation distribution inequalities in COPD. The relevance of these abnormalities to dyspnea and exercise intolerance across the continuum of disease severity remains unknown. Two-hundred and seventy-six COPD patients distributed across GOLD grades 1 to 4 and 67 healthy controls were evaluated. The “poorly communicating fraction” (PCF) of the TLC was estimated as the ratio (%) of TLC to VA. Healthy subjects showed significantly lower PCF values compared to GOLD grades 1 to 4 (10 ± 3% vs. 17 ± 8% vs. 27 ± 10% vs. 37 ± 10% vs. 56 ± 11%, respectively; p < 0.05). Pulmonary gas exchange impairment, mechanical ventilatory constraints and ventilation-corrected dyspnea scores worsened across PCF tertiles (p < 0.05). Of note, GOLD grades 1 and 2 patients with the highest PCF values had pronounced exercise ventilatory inefficiency and dyspnea as a limiting symptom. In fact, dyspnea was a significant contributor to exercise limitation only in those with “moderate” or “extensive” PCF (p < 0.05). A receiver operating characteristics curve analysis revealed that PCF was a better predictor of severely reduced maximal exercise capacity than traditional pulmonary function indexes including FEV1 (area under the curve (95% confidence interval) = 0.85 (0.81–0.89), best cutoff = 33.4%; p < 0.01). In conclusion, PCF is a readily available functional marker of gas exchange and mechanical abnormalities relevant to dyspnea and exercise intolerance across the COPD grades.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.