Abstract
e18289 Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention in oncology patients during external beam radiation therapy (RT) in outpatient setting is the challenging question. We performed analysis of our own data. The aim of study is the clear assessment of VTE incidence in these patients Methods: In retrospective analysis 5134 patients' medical records were included (2612 with RT and 2522 with chemotherapy). Inclusion criteria were: RT in outpatient setting and chemotherapy in outpatient setting. Exclusion criteria: combined radiochemotherapy, hospitalzation, central venous catheter, palliative treatment. 487 patients were selected for the final analysis and stratified in 3 groups: group I (n = 165) 3D-conformal RT for brain tumors or brain metastasis; group II (n = 158) RT for body tumors (abdominal, retroabdominal, pelvic, chest, breast); group III (n = 164) was control –brain and body tumors on chemotherapy. Mean fraction numbers were 25 (11 - 32), mean total dose – 52 Gy (22 - 66). VTE assessment based on clinical data, ultrasound examination (US) and chest CT. Statistical analysis was performed by OpenEpi, Version 3 software pack. Results: Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) was detected in 10 cases (6.06%) in group I, 4 cases in group II and 4 case in control group. VTE patients has a different tumors (astrocytomas, brain trunk tumors, skull basis cancer, rectal cancer, breast cancer). 3 patients were available for long-term outcomes assessment (12 months after radiation therapy). During 1-year period we haven’t detected thrombosis recurrence. One patient on 11th follow-up month was exposed with repeated course of RT without any complications. The difference between VTE incidence for group I and group III characterized by statistical significance (p = 0.018). Risk difference for these groups was 5% (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Based on study results we suggest that external beam radiation therapy is potentially an independent risk factor for VTE development even in outpatient settings. High degree of clinical suspicion and aggressive diagnostic work-up in case of suspicion is necessary. In our opinion low molecular weight heparins prevention should be considered at least during active radiation therapy.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
