Abstract

Critically ill children and those sustaining severe traumatic injuries are at higher risk for developing venous thromboembolism (VTE) than other hospitalized children. Multiple factors including the need for central venous catheters, immobility, surgical procedures, malignancy, and dysregulated inflammatory state confer this increased risk. As well as being at higher risk of VTE, this population is frequently at an increased risk of bleeding, making the decision of prophylactic anticoagulation even more nuanced. The use of pharmacologic and mechanical prophylaxis remains variable in this high-risk cohort. VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis is an accepted practice in adult trauma and intensive care to prevent VTE development and associated morbidity, but it is not standardized in critically ill or injured children. Given the lack of pediatric specific guidelines, prevention strategies are variably extrapolated from the successful use of mechanical and pharmacologic prophylaxis in adults, despite the differences in developmental hemostasis and thrombosis risk between children and adults. Whether the burden of VTE can be reduced in the pediatric critically ill or injured population is not known given the lack of robust data. There are no trials in children showing efficacy of mechanical compression devices or prophylactic anticoagulation in reducing the rate of VTE. Risk stratification using clinical factors has been shown to identify those at highest risk for VTE and allows targeted prophylaxis. It remains unproven if such a strategy will mitigate the risk of VTE and its potential sequelae.

Highlights

  • Venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnosis in hospitalized children appears to have increased markedly over the past decade [1]

  • VTE risk prediction and stratification remains a challenge and robust risk scoring systems remain elusive in children

  • Even if one were to develop the perfect risk screen, there are no data showing a benefit from prophylaxis in critically ill children

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnosis in hospitalized children appears to have increased markedly over the past decade [1]. Ill and/or severely injured children are at a disproportionately higher risk of VTE events due to the presence of multiple VTE risk factors [2, 3]. Clinical diagnosis of VTE can be especially challenging in a critically ill and severely injured child as extremity swelling and erythema may be non-specific signs and self-reporting of pain is limited by sedation, immobility, and physical state. A high degree of suspicion is needed on the part of a clinician to perform imaging and diagnose VTE

VTE in Critically Ill and Injured Children
Trauma Trauma Trauma
Other risk factors
PREVENTION OF VTE IN CRITICALLY ILL OR INJURED CHILDREN
PREDICTING VTE RISK IN CHILDREN AFTER TRAUMA
Findings
FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call