Venkatapuram Responds to "Positive epidemiology, revisited: The case for centering human rights and economic justice".

Abstract

This commentary responds to the article by Qureishi et al. (Am J Epidemol. XXXX;XXX(XX):XXXX-XXXX)) that criticizes a new proposal for "positive epidemiology." They argue that positive epidemiology as it is being proposed and conducted ignores supra-individual social contextual factors that constrain wellbeing of some individuals more than others, and it could exacerbate inequalities if applied at a population level, among other harms. They offer an alternative approach to defining causal factors that are helpful for wellbeing, and seek to ground their view in human rights and economic justice frameworks. This commentary considers their criticisms of PE and suggests that their alternative as well as all research into positive health and wellbeing would benefit from drawing on the ongoing debates and works in health equity and justice philosophy. A coherent conception of health and wellbeing, the link between health/wellbeing and theories of justice, and the capabilities approach are discussed. The efforts at conducting epidemiology for the causes and distribution of good health and wellbeing grounded in justice is welcomed.