Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper is a commentary and response to Anne Clerval’s paper Gentrification and social classes in Paris, 1982–2008, which is published in this volume. While agreeing with many of her conclusions regarding social class change and gentrification in Paris, and highlighting the parallels with London, the paper argues that both London and Paris have become more middle class cities in the last 40–50 years, not wholly middle-class cities. Second, it argues that Clerval is wrong to suggest that gentrification is the principal cause of social class change in Paris. The causation is likely to be the other way round. Third, it argues that Clerval is wrong to criticize the replacement thesis as ideological and she herself accepts that displacement and replacement go hand in hand. But overall, her paper raises a number of stimulating and important issues regarding the relationships between urban economic change and gentrification.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.