Venetoclax combined with hypomethylating agents for favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia: A single center experience.

Abstract

e18514 Background: Favorable risk acute myeloid leukemia (FR-AML) is typically treated with intensive induction chemotherapy followed by high dose consolidative cytarabine. However, a subgroup of FR-AML are not candidates for high intensity induction because of advanced age, comorbidities, or poor performance status. For these patients, hypomethylating agents (HMA) combined with venetoclax (HMA-Ven) is inferred as the standard of care based upon results of the VIALE-A trial; however, that trial enrolled only intermediate or poor risk AML. The efficacy of HMA-Ven in FR-AML is unclear. Here we present a single center experience of this regimen in FR-AML. Methods: In this retrospective single center case series, we collected data from all patients >18 years old with newly diagnosed FR-AML between January 2018 to December 2022 at AdventHealth Orlando who were treated with HMA-Ven. Patient with relapsed/refractory disease or a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia were excluded. FR-AML was defined using ELN 2022 guidelines based on the results of genomic testing of the initial bone marrow aspirate. The primary endpoints were the complete remission (CR) rate and 1-year overall survival (OS). Statistical analyses were performed using the R survminer package. Results: Newly diagnosed FR-AML who received HMA-Ven were identified (n=12). The median age was 67.5 years. 3 (25%) cases had inversion of chromosome 16 and 9 (75%) had NPM1 mutations without FLT3-ITD mutations. 11 (92%) patients received decitabine and venetoclax. Patients received a median of 2.5 cycles of HMA-Ven, and all 12 patients achieved CR after one cycle of treatment. 6 (50%) patients were consolidated with intermediate-dose cytarabine (IDAC), 3 (25%) continued HMA-Ven, 2 (17%) underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant, and 1 (8%) received enasidenib. The 1-year OS was 80% (CI 0.59-1), and the median OS was not reached. 1 patient died due to chemotherapy toxicity with IDAC, and 1 patient died due to heart complications. 2 patients relapsed, 1 after IDAC and 1 after intolerance to further treatment after 6 cycles of HMA-Ven. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that HMA-Ven is an effective treatment for newly diagnosed favorable risk AML. All patients achieved CR with one cycle of treatment with most surviving more than one year. Large multicenter studies are needed to further validate these promising results.