Velocity gradients and turbulence around macrophyte stands in streams

Abstract

1. Submerged macrophytes strongly modify water flow in small lowland streams. The present study investigated turbulence and vertical velocity gradients using small hot‐wire anemometers in the vicinity and within the canopies of four macrophyte species with the objective of evaluating: (a) how plant canopies influence velocity gradients and shear force on the surfaces of the plants and the stream bed; and (b) how the presence and morphology of plants influence the intensity of turbulence.2. Water velocity was often relatively constant with water depth both outside and inside the plant canopies, but the velocity declined steeply immediately above the unvegetated stream bed. Steep vertical velocity profiles were also observed in the transition to the surface of the macrophyte canopy of three of the plant species forming a dense shielding structure of high biomass. Less steep vertical profiles were observed at the open canopy surface of the fourth plant species, growing from a basal meristem and having the biomass more homogeneously distributed with depth. The complex distribution of hydraulic roughness between the stream bed, the banks and the plants resulted in velocity profiles which often fitted better to a linear than to a logarithmic function of distance above the sediment and canopy surfaces.3. Turbulence increased in proportion to the mean flow velocity, but the slope of the relationships differed in a predictable manner among positions outside and inside the canopies of the different species, suggesting that their morphology and movements influenced the intensity of turbulence. Turbulence was maintained in the attenuated flow inside the plant canopies, despite estimates of low Reynolds numbers, demonstrating that reliable evaluation of flow patterns requires direct measurements. The mean velocity inside plant canopies mostly exceeded 2 cm s−−1 and turbulence intensity remained above 0.2 cm s−−1, which should be sufficient to prevent carbon limitation of photosynthesis in CO2‐rich streams, while plant growth may benefit from the reduced physical disturbance and the retention of nutrient‐rich sediment particles.4. Flow patterns were highly reproducible within canopies of the individual species despite differences in stand size and location among streams. We propose that individual plant stands are suitable functional units for analysing the influence of submerged macrophytes on flow patterns, retention of particles and biological communities in lowland streams.