Abstract
This paper investigates the effectiveness of probabilistic decision-level fusion in the context of vehicle detection from gray-scale images. Specifically, we demonstrate that probabilistic fusion rules often disregard the “physical” meaning of classifier outputs and make assumptions that might not hold in practice. As a result, their performance is seriously affected. To support our argument, we have trained two Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers to perform vehicle detection using two types of features: Harr Wavelet and Gabor. To classify an input pattern, the output of the SVM classifier needs to be thresholded first. In this case, each output represents a class. When considering the raw SVM outputs (i.e., without thresholding), however, each output represents a “distance” between the input pattern and the decision boundary. Unfortunately, some popular probabilistic decision-level fusion rules, such as the Sum and Product rules, disregard the physical meaning of the raw SVM outputs. Moreover, they make assumptions about data independence and distribution models which might not hold in practice. Motivated by these observations, we propose a simple but effective decision-level fusion rule which exploits the physical meaning of the SVM outputs and does not make any assumptions about the data. We have evaluated the proposed rule on real data sets, showing that it outperforms traditional probabilistic fusion rules.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.