Abstract

The majority of people in East Africa rely on the agro-pastoral system for their livelihood, which is highly vulnerable to droughts and flooding. Agro-pastoral droughts are endemic to the region and are considered the main natural hazard that contributes to food insecurity. Drought begins with rainfall deficit, gradually leading to soil moisture deficit, higher land surface temperature, and finally impacts to vegetation growth. Therefore, monitoring vegetation conditions is essential in understanding the progression of drought, potential effects on food security, and providing early warning information needed for drought mitigation decisions. Because vegetation processes couple the land and atmosphere, monitoring of vegetation conditions requires consideration of both water provision and demand. While there is consensus in using either the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) or evapotranspiration (ET) for vegetation monitoring, a comprehensive assessment optimizing the use of both has not yet been done. Moreover, the evaluation methods for understanding the relationships between NDVI and ET for vegetation monitoring are also limited. Taking these gaps into account we have developed a framework to optimize vegetation monitoring using both NDVI and ET by identifying where they perform the best by using triple collocation and cross-correlation methods. We estimated the random error structure in Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) NDVI; ET from the Operational Simplified Surface Energy Balance (SSEBop) model; and ET from land surface models (LSMs). LSM ET and SSEBop ET have been found to be better indicators for vegetation monitoring during extreme drought events, while NDVI could provide better information on vegetation condition during wetter than normal conditions. The random error structures of these variables suggest that LSM ET is most likely to provide important information for vegetation monitoring over low and high ends of the vegetation fraction areas. Over moderate vegetative areas, any of these variables could provide important vegetation information for drought characterization and food security assessments. While this study provides a framework for optimizing vegetation monitoring for drought and food security assessments over East Africa, the framework can be adopted to optimize vegetation monitoring over any other drought and food insecure region of the world.

Highlights

  • East Africa, with around 330 million inhabitants (Gebremeskel et al, 2019), is one of the chronically food insecure regions of the world

  • Over moderately vegetative areas, a consistent correlation (r > 0.5) can be observed between ET and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) at the monthly time scale, which implies that any of these variables could be a good indicator of vegetation condition over moderately vegetated areas

  • We performed cross-correlation and triple collocation analyses to characterize relationships between ET from remotely sensed measurements (SSEBop) and from LSMs (Noah, Variable Infiltration Capacity (VIC), and Catchment Land Surface Model (CLSM)) and a biophysical variable directly computed from surface reflectance measured by satellite sensors, NDVI

Read more

Summary

Introduction

East Africa, with around 330 million inhabitants (Gebremeskel et al, 2019), is one of the chronically food insecure regions of the world. With the launch of the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) instrument on board National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) Terra and Aqua satellites, more recent studies have developed different methods utilizing MODIS-NDVI for monitoring vegetation dynamics, drought progression, and food security assessments (Brown, 2016; Klisch and Atzberger, 2016; Zewdie et al, 2017; Mbatha and Xulu, 2018). These studies take advantage of the higher spatial resolution and more accurate geolocation data provided by MODIS sensors over AVHRR (Townshend and Justice, 2002). Using MODIS-NDVI, among other variables, Robinson et al (2019) demonstrated the negative response of vegetation growth to the 2010–2011 drought in East Africa

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call