Abstract
ABSTRACT LIght Detection And Ranging (lidar) data have been widely used in the areas of ecological studies due to lidar’s ability to provide information on the vertical structure of vegetation in wildlife habitats. The overall objective of this project was to map the vegetation on No Name Key, Florida where endangered wildlife species reside using publicly available remote sensing data such as lidar data and high resolution aerial images (including National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP) images). The methods involved the use of 4 different classification algorithms (Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Maximum Likelihood, and Mahalanobis Distance), different classification settings (default and custom settings), and normalization (original and normalized input bands) on 2 different input stacked images, NAIP image alone and NAIP combined with lidar data. A majority filter was applied to each classification output before performing the accuracy assessment. The result of performing the image classifications showed the following: across all inputs and classification algorithms, the highest overall accuracy (OA) and kappa coefficient (к) were achieved by the Random Forest classification on the NAIP-lidar stacked image with an applied majority filter and original input bands. The result also showed the airborne data combined with the lidar data resulted in a higher classification accuracy than the airborne data alone; and when normalization was applied to all the input bands or layers, the classification accuracies were not increased in most cases compared to when original bands were used in the classification. In most cases, the application of the majority filter increased the accuracy of the classification results as opposed to when no majority filter was applied. Instead of using default values, when the new parameter values (i.e., custom settings) for the penalty parameter (C) and the gamma (ɤ) were used, the accuracies of the Support Vector Machine (SVM) classified images were slightly increased compared to using the default values for the 2 parameters. With increased availability of public lidar data, combining the aerial image with lidar data would enhance the accuracy of vegetation mapping, which would lead to more effective and accurate wildlife management.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.