Abstract

Vegetation removal with fire can alter the thermal regime of the land surface, leading to significant changes in biogeochemistry (e.g. carbon cycling) and soil hydrology. In the UK, large expanses of carbon-rich upland environments are managed to encourage increased abundance of red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica) by rotational burning of shrub vegetation. To date, though, there has not been any consideration of whether prescribed vegetation burning on peatlands modifies the thermal regime of the soil mass in the years after fire. In this study thermal regime was monitored across 12 burned peatland soil plots over an 18-month period, with the aim of (i) quantifying thermal dynamics between burned plots of different ages (from <2 to 15 + years post burning), and (ii) developing statistical models to determine the magnitude of thermal change caused by vegetation management. Compared to plots burned 15 + years previously, plots recently burned (<2–4 years) showed higher mean, maximum and range of soil temperatures, and lower minima. Statistical models (generalised least square regression) were developed to predict daily mean and maximum soil temperature in plots burned 15 + years prior to the study. These models were then applied to predict temperatures of plots burned 2, 4 and 7 years previously, with significant deviations from predicted temperatures illustrating the magnitude of burn management effects. Temperatures measured in soil plots burned <2 years previously showed significant statistical disturbances from model predictions, reaching +6.2 °C for daily mean temperatures and +19.6 °C for daily maxima. Soil temperatures in plots burnt 7 years previously were most similar to plots burned 15 + years ago indicating the potential for soil temperatures to recover as vegetation regrows. Our findings that prescribed peatland vegetation burning alters soil thermal regime should provide an impetus for further research to understand the consequences of thermal regime change for carbon processing and release, and hydrological processes, in these peatlands.

Highlights

  • Temperature plays an important role in soil ecosystem biogeochemistry by directly moderating rates of mineral weathering and soil water solution reactions (Brady and Weil, 2013), and indirectly by influencing the decomposition of organic matter (Davidson and Janssens, 2006; Grosse et al, 2011) and uptake of nutrients by soil dwelling flora and fauna (Allison et al, 2010; Conant et al, 2011; Melillo et al, 2002)

  • Soil temperature plays a major role in global biogeochemical cycles, and so a clear understanding of the processes influencing soil thermal regime is a key requirement for ecosystem scientists and land managers to manage terrestrial environments effectively

  • Dev) of temperature decreased with depth into the soil at all 12 plots, while minima were greater as depth increased (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Temperature plays an important role in soil ecosystem biogeochemistry by directly moderating rates of mineral weathering and soil water solution reactions (Brady and Weil, 2013), and indirectly by influencing the decomposition of organic matter (Davidson and Janssens, 2006; Grosse et al, 2011) and uptake of nutrients by soil dwelling flora and fauna (Allison et al, 2010; Conant et al, 2011; Melillo et al, 2002). Soil surface temperature can influence latent heat fluxes and soil moisture (Kettridge et al, 2012), and is crucial for geomorphological processes such as freeze-thaw weathering (Holden, 2007). Soil temperature plays a major role in global biogeochemical cycles, and so a clear understanding of the processes influencing soil thermal regime is a key requirement for ecosystem scientists and land managers to manage terrestrial environments effectively. Vegetation burning on UK peatlands has been associated with increased dissolved organic carbon (DOC) release to rivers in several studies with implications for potable water treatment (Holden et al, 2012), but the processes that underpin changes in soil C cycling and DOC release to rivers following fires are still poorly understood

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call