Abstract

BackgroundThere is limited prospective evidence on possible differences in fracture risks between vegetarians, vegans, and non-vegetarians. We aimed to study this in a prospective cohort with a large proportion of non-meat eaters.MethodsIn EPIC-Oxford, dietary information was collected at baseline (1993–2001) and at follow-up (≈ 2010). Participants were categorised into four diet groups at both time points (with 29,380 meat eaters, 8037 fish eaters, 15,499 vegetarians, and 1982 vegans at baseline in analyses of total fractures). Outcomes were identified through linkage to hospital records or death certificates until mid-2016. Using multivariable Cox regression, we estimated the risks of total (n = 3941) and site-specific fractures (arm, n = 566; wrist, n = 889; hip, n = 945; leg, n = 366; ankle, n = 520; other main sites, i.e. clavicle, rib, and vertebra, n = 467) by diet group over an average of 17.6 years of follow-up.ResultsCompared with meat eaters and after adjustment for socio-economic factors, lifestyle confounders, and body mass index (BMI), the risks of hip fracture were higher in fish eaters (hazard ratio 1.26; 95% CI 1.02–1.54), vegetarians (1.25; 1.04–1.50), and vegans (2.31; 1.66–3.22), equivalent to rate differences of 2.9 (0.6–5.7), 2.9 (0.9–5.2), and 14.9 (7.9–24.5) more cases for every 1000 people over 10 years, respectively. The vegans also had higher risks of total (1.43; 1.20–1.70), leg (2.05; 1.23–3.41), and other main site fractures (1.59; 1.02–2.50) than meat eaters. Overall, the significant associations appeared to be stronger without adjustment for BMI and were slightly attenuated but remained significant with additional adjustment for dietary calcium and/or total protein. No significant differences were observed in risks of wrist or ankle fractures by diet group with or without BMI adjustment, nor for arm fractures after BMI adjustment.ConclusionsNon-meat eaters, especially vegans, had higher risks of either total or some site-specific fractures, particularly hip fractures. This is the first prospective study of diet group with both total and multiple specific fracture sites in vegetarians and vegans, and the findings suggest that bone health in vegans requires further research.

Highlights

  • There is limited prospective evidence on possible differences in fracture risks between vegetarians, vegans, and non-vegetarians

  • Non-meat eaters, especially vegans, had higher risks of either total or some site-specific fractures, hip fractures. This is the first prospective study of diet group with both total and multiple specific fracture sites in vegetarians and vegans, and the findings suggest that bone health in vegans requires further research

  • Previous metaanalyses have found that calcium supplements are effective in producing small increases in bone mineral density (BMD) [9], it is less clear whether this degree of improvement would be sufficient to reduce fracture risks [10]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

There is limited prospective evidence on possible differences in fracture risks between vegetarians, vegans, and non-vegetarians. Previous epidemiological studies have shown that vegetarians had lower bone mineral density (BMD) than non-vegetarians [2, 3], but the associations of vegetarian diets with fracture risks are unclear. While older studies suggested that high protein intake might lead to higher calcium excretion and weaker bones [12], more recent evidence has suggested a positive association between protein and bone health, this might not translate to differences in fracture risk [13]. BMI is an important factor for fracture risk [14], and a recent study suggested that the lower BMD observed in US vegetarians might be largely explained by their lower BMI and waist circumference [15]. The directions of association between BMI and fracture risk differ across fracture sites, and low BMI has been associated with a higher risk of hip fracture but lower risk of ankle fracture [14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call