Abstract

Many small organisms in various life stages can be transported in the digestive system of larger vertebrates, a process known as endozoochory. Potential dispersal distances of these “propagules” are generally calculated after monitoring retrieval in experiments with resting vector animals. We argue that vectors in natural situations will be actively moving during effective transport rather than resting. We here test for the first time how physical activity of a vector animal might affect its dispersal efficiency. We compared digestive characteristics between swimming, wading (i.e. resting in water) and isolation (i.e. resting in a cage) mallards (Anas platyrhynchos). We fed plastic markers and aquatic gastropods, and monitored retrieval and survival of these propagules in the droppings over 24 h. Over a period of 5 h of swimming, mallards excreted 1.5 times more markers than when wading and 2.3 times more markers than isolation birds, the pattern being reversed over the subsequent period of monitoring where all birds were resting. Retention times of markers were shortened for approximately 1 h for swimming, and 0.5 h for wading birds. Shorter retention times imply higher survival of propagules at increased vector activity. However, digestive intensity measured directly by retrieval of snail shells was not a straightforward function of level of activity. Increased marker size had a negative effect on discharge rate. Our experiment indicates that previous estimates of propagule dispersal distances based on resting animals are overestimated, while propagule survival seems underestimated. These findings have implications for the dispersal of invasive species, meta-population structures and long distance colonization events.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00442-012-2293-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Many small organisms can be transported alive in the digestive system of more mobile vertebrates, i.e. by endozoochory

  • Our experiment indicates that previous estimates of propagule dispersal distances based on resting animals are overestimated, while propagule survival seems underestimated

  • The fact that active animals have shorter retention times and higher propagule survival rates implies that past estimates of long-distance dispersal potential using captive vertebrates may have overestimated dispersal distances, while underestimating propagule survival

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Many small organisms can be transported alive in the digestive system of more mobile vertebrates, i.e. by endozoochory. The potential importance and generality of this process was recognized a long time ago (Darwin 1859; Ridley 1930) Mammals, such as bears, foxes and musk ox, forage on seeds and fruits, and defecate surviving seeds after travelling tens of kilometres across the landscape (e.g., Bruun et al 2008; Koike et al 2011). Many migratory animals, such as wildebeest, reindeer, Wsh, turtles, and numerous species of birds, can potentially transport seeds and invertebrates in various life stages (hereafter referred to as “propagules”) over even hundreds of kilometres (Liu et al 2004; Anne Bråthen et al 2007; Traveset et al 2008; Brochet et al 2009; Pollux 2011; Raulings et al 2011). Retention times and propagule survival might be diVerent for actively moving (and dispersing) vectors than for inactive animals in cages

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.