Abstract
The spatial coherence properties of high power vertical cavity surface emitting lasers (VCSELs) are studied based on the theorem of partially coherent light proposed by Van Cittert-Zernike. The interference stripe patterns are gauged using the Young's double-slit experiment for the devices of 980 nm wavelength VCSEL single emitters. Then interference patterns are switched to grayscale by intensity distribution patterns for data collection. In this paper, the integral average value method is proposed to calculate the degree of spatial coherence. The proposed integral average value method and traditional average method are used respectively to calculate the light intensity of the pattern. The results are compared with those calculated by the theoretical value of Van Cittert-Zernike theorem. The VCSEL optical apertures' influence on coherent characteristics are also discussed. The experimental results show that, a relative error within 2.5%~9.4% is reached by our integral average value method. On the contrary, a relative error of 7.5%~67.4% are got from the traditional average method. Apparently, traditional average value method causes the error generally 1.5~27 times worse than our integral average value method. Moreover, for single emitter VCSELs with optical aperture from 200 m to 500 m, the smaller the optical aperture are, the larger the coherent degrees (between 0.731~0.426) are. The conclusion can be wildly used on theoretical and experimental design for VCSEL coherent arrays.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.