Abstract
BackgroundPost-traumatic residual haemothorax (RH) is common and carries significant morbidity. However, its optimal treatment is not clear. AimThe aim of this study was to find the extent of this problem and the choice of treatment between VATS and intra-pleural streptokinase instillation (IPSI). Material and methodsThis RCT, conducted over 18 months period, included all patients of chest trauma between 18 and 70 years of age, admitted with haemothorax or haemopneumothorax requiring inter-costal drain (ICD) insertion. 154 events of haemothorax/haemopneumothorax requiring ICD insertion were enrolled. RH was seen in 48 (31%) patients: 13 patients were excluded from RCT after refusal for treatment. Seventeen (49%) patients of remaining 35 RH cases were randomized to IPSI group and 18 (51%) patients were randomized to VATS group. The outcome parameters were resolution of RH and treatment related complications. ResultsRH resolved equally well in VATS and IPSI group [13 patients (72%) versus 12 patients (71%), respectively; continuity-adjusted p=1]. Morbidity wise no difference (p-value 0.529) was seen in the two groups. ConclusionPost-traumatic RH is seen in 1/3rd patients and is equally well treated by VATS and IPSI.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
