VASOPRESSOR-RESISTANT HYPOTENSION, COMBINATION VASOPRESSOR THERAPY, AND SHOCK PHENOTYPES IN CRITICALLY ILL ADULTS WITH VASODILATORY SHOCK.

Abstract

ABSTRACTObjective: To examine the risk factors, resource utilization, and 1-year mortality associated with vasopressor-resistant hypotension (VRH) compared with vasopressor-sensitive hypotension (VSH) among critically ill adults with vasodilatory shock. We also examined whether combination vasopressor therapy and patient phenotype were associated with mortality. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Eight medical-surgical intensive care units at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA. Patients: Critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock admitted between July 2000 and October 2008. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: Vasopressor-resistant hypotension was defined as those requiring greater than 0.2 μg/kg per minute of norepinephrine equivalent dose of vasopressor consecutively for more than 6 h, and VSH was defined as patients requiring ≤0.2 μg/kg per minute to maintain MAP between 55 and 70 mm Hg after adequate fluid resuscitation. Of 5,313 patients with vasodilatory shock, 1,291 patients (24.3%) developed VRH. Compared with VSH, VRH was associated with increased risk of acute kidney injury (72.7% vs. 65.0%; P < 0.001), use of kidney replacement therapy (26.0% vs. 11.0%; P < 0.001), longer median (interquartile range [IQR]) intensive care unit length of stay (10 [IQR, 4.0–20.0] vs. 6 [IQR, 3.0–13.0] days; P < 0.001), and increased 1-year mortality (64.7% vs. 34.8%; P < 0.001). Vasopressor-resistant hypotension was associated with increased odds of risk-adjusted mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.52–3.40; P < 0.001). When compared with monotherapy, combination vasopressor therapy with two (aOR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.78–1.06) and three or more vasopressors was not associated with lower mortality (aOR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.68–1.27). Using a finite mixture model, we identified four unique phenotypes of patient clusters that differed with respect to demographics, severity of illness, processes of care, vasopressor use, and outcomes. Conclusions: Among critically ill patients with vasodilatory shock, VRH compared with VSH is associated with increased resource utilization and long-term risk of death. However, combination vasopressor therapy was not associated with lower risk of death. We identified four unique phenotypes of patient clusters that require further validation.