Abstract

Elephant populations in South Africa are largely confined to fenced reserves and therefore require continued management to prevent high elephant densities that may cause habitat degradation. Growing human populations surrounding these reserves limit the possibility for wildlife range expansion, adding socio-economic considerations to the growing list of challenges reserve managers must contend with. Often, reserves have therefore opted to manage elephant population growth using various contraceptive methods to reduce birth rates, with lethal control acting as a last resort.Reserve owners at the Pongola Game Reserve South in northern KwaZulu-Natal opted to vasectomise the oldest male elephants to limit elephant population growth. Besides the reduction in birth rates, vasectomies were anticipated to have minimal impacts on behaviour. This study aimed to examine behavioural implications of treatment by monitoring musth, dominance and social behaviours of vasectomised males.Physical and behavioural observations of vasectomised males were recorded using instantaneous scan sampling and continuous focal samples of study individuals between 2011 and 2016. These data were also collected for non-treated adolescent males, with which to substantiate potential impacts of vasectomies.This case study has revealed that the behaviour of the vasectomised males was not influenced by vasectomies: musth was displayed as anticipated in the oldest males; a linear dominance hierarchy was maintained, headed by the oldest individual, and association patterns with female groups remained intact. Further, the younger non-treated males fell in line with the overall dominance hierarchy.This unique post-treatment study supports the use of vasectomies as a relatively cost-effective (one-off treatment), low-risk and successful tool for the management of elephant population growth, and an option which is preferable to both lethal control and hormonal contraceptives. Further research to establish the impacts of vasectomies on female behaviour and population dynamics is recommended.

Highlights

  • Across most of Africa, elephants are increasingly losing the competition for space with a burgeoning human population over the past decades (Parker & Graham 1989)

  • In East Africa, elephants still range beyond reserve boundaries and travel historical migration paths (Chase et al 2016); with a growing human population and the associated conversion of elephant habitats into human-dominated landscapes, the management of elephants in East Africa could move towards the southern African model, where elephant populations become confined to small fenced reserves, unable to migrate and kept at increasingly high densities

  • We examine the behavioural implications of vasectomies in terms of musth behaviour, dominance hierarchies and association patterns of male elephants

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Across most of Africa, elephants are increasingly losing the competition for space with a burgeoning human population over the past decades (Parker & Graham 1989). In East Africa, elephants still range beyond reserve boundaries and travel historical migration paths (Chase et al 2016); with a growing human population and the associated conversion of elephant habitats into human-dominated landscapes, the management of elephants in East Africa could move towards the southern African model, where elephant populations become confined to small fenced reserves, unable to migrate and kept at increasingly high densities. Elephant populations in many of these southern African reserves are growing and have attained densities higher than previously thought possible. Such irruptive growth (Mackey et al 2009) has sparked concerns that high elephant densities may have negative impacts on vegetation (Slater 2012), and elephant population control has become a necessary practice for reserve managers. Increasing human populations leave little or no opportunity for reserve expansion, and so attention has turned to reducing or limiting elephant population growth within reserves

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call