Abstract

PurposeDue to thromboembolic complications and in-stent-stenosis after flow diverter (FD) treatment, the long-term use of dual antiplatelet treatment (DAPT) is mandatory. The tested nano-coating has been shown to reduce material thrombogenicity and promote endothelial cell proliferation in vitro. We compared the biocompatibility of coated (Derivo Heal) and non-coated (Derivo bare) FDs with DAPT in an animal model.MethodsDerivo® bare (n = 10) and Derivo® Heal (n = 10) FD were implanted in the common carotid arteries (CCAs) of New Zealand white rabbits. One additional FD, alternately a Derivo bare (n = 5) or Derivo Heal (n = 5), was implanted in the abdominal aorta (AA) for assessment of the patency of branch arteries. Histopathological examinations were performed after 28 days. Angiography was performed before and after FD implantation and at follow-up.ResultsStatistical analysis of the included specimens showed complete endothelialization of all FDs with no significant differences in neointima thickness between Derivo® bare and Derivo® Heal (CCA: p = 0.91; AA: p = 0.59). A significantly reduced number of macrophages in the vessel wall of the Derivo Heal was observed for the CCA (p = 0.02), and significantly reduced fibrin and platelet deposition on the surface of the Derivo Heal was observed for the AA. All branch arteries of the stented aorta remained patent.ConclusionIn this animal model, the novel fibrin-based coated FD showed a similar blood and tissue compatibility as the non-coated FD.

Highlights

  • Flow diversion has revolutionized the treatment of complex and broad-necked intracranial aneurysms [1]

  • A significantly reduced number of macrophages in the vessel wall of the Derivo Heal was observed for the common carotid arteries (CCAs) (p = 0.02), and significantly reduced fibrin and platelet deposition on the surface of the Derivo Heal was observed for the AA

  • The mean fibrin/platelet deposition on the stent struts was rated as minimal with a significantly lower amount of deposition on the Derivo Heal compared to the Derivo bare (p = 0.03) in the AA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Flow diversion has revolutionized the treatment of complex and broad-necked intracranial aneurysms [1]. Recent clinical data demonstrated superior occlusion and less reperfusion of aneurysms treated with flow diverters (FDs) compared to both coiling and stent-assisted coiling [2]. FD implantation carries the risks of periprocedural and delayed complications such as ischemia due to thromboembolic events [3, 4] or the development of instent stenosis [5, 6]. Dual anti-platelet therapy (DAPT) is mandatory to decrease these risks [7]. R. Muhl-Benninghaus et al.: Vascular Response on a Novel Fibrin-Based Coated

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call