Abstract
Blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity can be determined by tracer infusion into the circulation followed by measurements of its penetration into the brain parenchyma. Tracer injection through the intraperitoneal (i.p.) route (rather than intravascular injection) avoids confounding effects of animal anesthesia or immobilization/surgical stress. Evans blue dye (EBD) can be administered by i.p. injection, and once in circulation, it binds to plasma albumin to become an endogenous protein tracer. Here, we investigated whether a similar level of EBD is extravasated into the brain following i.p. versus intravenous (i.v.) injection in rats. In comparison with i.v. EBD injection, i.p. EBD injection resulted in much of the tracer residing in the peritoneal cavity. Accordingly, comparatively less EBD was found in the blood, liver, or brain of BBB-intact rat. In addition, following unilateral osmotic BBB disruption, i.v. but not i.p. EBD stained the ipsilateral hemisphere blue. Nevertheless, following either route of tracer administration in these rats, spectrophotometric quantification detected more EBD in the ipsilateral (BBB-disrupted) than in the contralateral hemisphere. Taken together, in contrast to a recent report, we found that i.p. EBD resulted in less tracer in circulation and in peripheral/central organs than EBD delivered i.v. We nevertheless conclude that i.p. EBD delivered sufficient tracer for the detection of regional BBB disruption.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
